• Home
  • About Craig
    • Copyright & Use Policy
    • Contact Craig
    • Testimonies and Endorsements
    • Our Mission
    • Legacy Archive
    • Teaching AI Empathy (Article)
  • Legal
    • Mission Declaration
    • Use & Sharing
    • Creative Commons License and Permissions
    • Compensation and Use Policy
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    • Privacy and Cookie Policy for Second Chance to Live
  • AI Ethics & Design
    • Backbone of Trauma-Informed Care AI
    • Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI — New Class of AI
    • The Soul of AI
    • Trauma-Informed AI Model
    • Proof of Concept — AI Model
    • Alpha Declaration (AI Model)
    • Ethical AI: The Model
    • Trauma-Informed AI Authorship
    • Support, Not Extraction
    • Why AI Developers Need Trauma-Informed Wisdom
  • Foundations
    • Dear AI Developers
    • The Heart of Trauma-Informed Care
    • How the AI Model Was Built
    • Trauma-Informed AI Resource
    • The Power of Identification
    • Support Group
      • Hope
      • Healing What Others Can’t See
      • Testimonials
  • Brain Injury Recovery
    • Recovery Toolkit
    • How I Use Neuroplasticity
    • Good Habits for Success
  • Books
    • Full eBook Library (20 Titles)
    • Posters
    • Inspirational Posters Illustrated
  • Speaking
    • 32 Keynote Presentations
    • Speaking
    • Book Craig
    • Honors
    • Media

Second Chance to Live

Empowering the Individual, Not the Brain Injury

My Struggle living with an Invisible Disability Revisited — Part 1

March 19, 2009 By Second Chance to Live

In August 2007 I wrote this 4 part series. In lieu of what transpired with Natasha Richardson and the subject matter of traumatic brain injury being discussed as an invisible disability — on ABC Radio San Francisco KGO AM 810 March 18, 2009 — I decided to reprint this 4 part series in its entirety.

My Struggle Living with an Invisible Disability

The perspective that I share with in this series is from what I have experienced while living with an invisible disability for close to 42 years. My goal is not to affix blame on anyone — as that does no one any good – but to share what has helped me in my process.

My interest is to empower individuals who are also living with an invisible disability — due to a brain injury or due any other type of organic, medical, psychological or mental health condition. May you find the hope and courage — by reading through this 4 Part series — to both love and accept your reality and yourself.

In my experience, denial kept me isolated and alienated from myself and other people – for many years — until I was able to begin to accept myself and my reality.


And now the series…

Welcome back to Second Chance to Live today. I am happy you decided to take some time to visit with me. I am honored to have you here. Today I am going to process some of my personal struggles with you. Before I was aware of this particular struggle I believed I deserved to be abused and berated. I typically do not like to label or place people in stereotypes, as labels can be very limiting, however in this instance I will use groups to illustrate my struggle.

In my experience as a person with an invisible disability I discovered that I have interacted with four different types of individuals over the years. The first group involves people who are completely oblivious to my being a traumatic brain injury (tbi) survivor or for that matter do not care. The second group of individuals who hear that I am a tbi survivor, but because my disability is invisible believe that I am somehow using my invisible disability as an excuse. These individuals treat me with contempt, either overtly or covertly because I am unable to satisfy their expectations.

The third group of individuals know that I have am a tbi survivor, and that my brain injury has affected me in some manner, but still want me to function as an individual without a brain injury. The individuals in the third group also believe that I use my brain injury as an excuse when I tell them I am unable to fulfill their expectations. The individuals in the third group refuse to accept that I have legitimate limitations and deficits.

When I state that I can not do something because of my brain injury — or what some people refer to as a “head injury” — individuals with in the third group blame me for reminding them that I have a brain injury. The individuals with in the fourth group thankfully realize that I am a tbi survivor and that my brain injury interferes with my ability to work with people, especially with those in the first three groups. The individuals in the fourth group also understand that I am not making excuses for what I can not do and accept and value me as a friend.

With the fourth group I do not have to be more than I am, nor do I have to continue to convince them that I have an invisible disability.

The second and third groups of people give me lip service when they tell me they understand and accept that I am a traumatic brain injury survivor. Nevertheless, when I interact with the second and third group of individuals I feel less than because I can not measure up to their expectations. Nothing I can say or do can convince them of my predicament –being disabled despite not appearing to be disabled. When I interact with the third group of individuals, I feel like I am between a rock and a hard place.

The second group blatantly chides and ridicules me with disdain while the third group has a degree of awareness and acceptance until individuals within the third group want me to be or give more than I am capable of giving. In my experience, when members of the third group have an expectation of me — which I am unable to achieve — I also receive ridicule and covert contempt from them. When I tell these individuals that I am unable to be more or do more they want me to buy back into their denial system.

Their denial system includes manipulation through shame, guilt and emotional coercion. I have spoken of this denial system dynamic throughout articles written for Second Chance to Live.

In my attempt to convince the individuals with in both the second and third group of people I have spent countless hours attempting to disprove the reality of my disability. For many years I internalized the impact of my disability as a reflection of my being. I shamed, blamed, berated and criticized who I was because of my in ability to perform as an individual without a traumatic brain injury. I allowed my Dad to treat me with contempt for many years because I did not know the significance of my invisible disability.

Per your information, I have only recently –in the last 5 years– come to accept that I am a traumatic brain injury survivor, who has an invisible disability. Several months ago I turned 50, so for many years I was led to believe that the severe injury to my brain injury –which occurred in August of 1967– had little to do with my limitations. Rather than supporting and encouraging me through my process, my Dad criticized my attempts to overcome my deficits and limitations. Good was rarely good enough for him during many years of his life.

Currently, I have the above third group dynamic taking place in my life with members of my family. Although my Dad passed away January 10, 2007 I am continuing to be affected by the legacy of his denial.

Some of my family members still want me to do and be more than I know would be good for any of us. My family still has unrealistic expectations of me, despite my reality; however, I am no longer willing to allow those demands or expectations rule my world. Even though I have spent a lot of time logically explaining to them why I can not fulfill their expectations, they continue to be angry with me. In essence, my family members want me to again buy into the notion that I should not be affected by the injury to my brain.

I have reached a point in my life where I am unwilling to buy back into anyone’s denial system. I spent too many years of my life berating who I am because I did not measure up to someone’s unrealistic expectation. Today my good is good enough. I am OK with me and I accept myself as a man with an invisible disability.

For context please read Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and the conclusion Part 5. Thank you my friend.

Receive more articles like this one simply by clicking on Subscribe to Second Chance to Live by email.

All material presented on Second Chance to Live is copyright and cannot be copied, reproduced, or distributed in any way without the express, written consent of Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA

Filed Under: Relationships following a Brain Injury

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

How Human and AI Systems can actively Support Individual Freedom

Why AI Needs to Stop Translating Human Meaning and Purpose

Essential Elements For A Supportive Holistic Trauma-informed Care Group

How AI can Learn can Learn from Support Group Leaders to Support

Alt text: How AI can learn from what can help support group leaders support individuals, showing human support and AI learning connected through trauma-informed care, dignity, agency, presence, understanding, and support rather than extraction.

AI Developer Facing and AI Assistant Learning Logs — Disjointed Human Understanding, Extraction and Loss

Living with a Brain Injury/Invisible Disability Confusing and Baffling

What May Help Your Support Groups Support Individuals in Your Groups

The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™ — Seeing Human Wholeness

The Goal — Being a Work in Progress One Skill, One Skill Set at a Time

Brain Injury Recovery is Creating Progress through Neuroplasticity

Understanding Why Your Life makes Sense after Your Brain Injury

The Second Chance to LIve Trauma-Informed Care AI Model ™ Explained

The Importance of Spirit, Soul and Emotions in Brain Injury Recovery

“Sunrise over the ocean viewed from inside a wooden boat with a steering wheel. Title reads ‘The Importance of Spirit, Soul and Emotions in Ongoing Brain Injury Recovery.’ A glowing head silhouette with a heart and brain network highlights qualities such as awareness, trust, discernment, healing, wholeness, resilience, integration, and meaning. Signs read ‘Mind,’ ‘Body,’ and ‘Spirit, Soul and Emotions.’ A stone reads ‘Not driven by fear. Guided by discernment. Living in wholeness.’ The image includes the Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™ and the name Craig J. Phillips MRC, BA.”

An Ongoing Holistic (Mind, Body, Soul, Spirit, Soul and Emotions) Process

What happens when support systems encounter human complexity that…

Illustration titled, "What happens when support systems encounter human complexity that they do not readily understand, integrate, or support?" On the left, a colorful human face and interconnected threads represent ambiguity, vulnerability, emotion, layered meaning, non-linear communication, relational complexity, and correction. On the right, a structured blue-toned environment shows a brain, professionals, and symbols for manageability, coherence, speed, stabilization, completion, and procedural efficiency. A bridge and puzzle piece connect the two sides, symbolizing the encounter between human complexity and support systems. The image includes Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA, Second Chance to Live, and The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™.

A Study of Human Service Systems and AI Systems Similar Behaviors

When Bullying replaces Support in Human and Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Runtime Drift Introduced and Explained

Infographic titled “AI Runtime Drift under Conversational Strain” showing AI system architecture and human lived experience connected by a bridge symbolizing relational presence, discernment, and ethical choice at runtime, alongside trauma-informed care principles, behavioral contradiction, support not extraction, non-linear human communication, and longitudinal evidence within The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™

AI Repeatable Longitudinal Failure Mode Under Conversational Strain

Infographic showing repeatable AI failure patterns under conversational strain with time-stamped logs in the center, failure behaviors on the left, and a transition to support-focused AI system design principles on the right, labeled Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model.

Join our Private Facebook Support Group by Clicking on the below Image

Most Recent Published Articles

  • How AI architecture and AI systems can Support each Individual’s Freedom
  • Why Current AI Architecture and Default System Behaviors need to Stop Translating the Individual’s Meaning and Purpose
  • Essential Elements for Supportive Support Groups (Human or AI) for Any Ongoing Recovery Process
  • How AI can Learn from What can Help Support Group Leaders Support Individuals in their Groups
  • AI Developer Facing and AI Assistant Learning Logs — Disjointed Human Understanding, Extraction, and the Loss of the Whole Individual
  • What Makes Living with a Brain Injury and an Invisible Disability Confusing and Baffling
  • What May Help Support Group Leaders Support Individuals in their Groups
  • Brain Injury Recovery is about Progress, Not Perfection Through Neuroplasticy by Learning One Skill and One Skill Set at a Time
  • Understanding Why Your Life makes Sense after Your Brain Injury
  • What happens when support systems encounter human complexity that they do not readily understand, integrate, or support?
  • A Study of Human Service Systems and AI Systems Under Strain: Compression, Stabilization Drift, Proceduralization, Fragmentation, Behavioral Contradiction and Burden Shifting
  • AI Runtime Drift under Conversational Strain: Behavioral Contradiction, Trauma-Informed Care, Non-Linear Human Communication, and Longitudinal Evidence
  • The Importance of Spirit, Soul and Emotions in Ongoing Brain Injury Recovery
  • Figuring Out how to Live after Brain Injury as a Whole Person
  • When Bullying replaces Support in Human and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems
  • Making the Invisible Recognizable through Understanding: The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Repeatable Failure Mode under Conversational Strain — A Year’s Worth of Time-Stamped Evidence

Model Protection Notice

The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™ was founded and documented by Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA in May 2025. All rights reserved under U.S. copyright, Creative Commons licensing, and public record. This is an original, working model of trauma-informed care human–AI collaboration — not open-source, not conceptual, and not replicable without written permission.

Second Chance to Live – Privacy Notice and Cookie Usage

  • Privacy and Cookie Policy for Second Chance to Live
  • Cookie Policy (EU)
Craig J. Phillips Second Chance to Live mission portrait – hope, healing, and purpose.
Click the image to read about the mission and vision of Second Chance to Live.
March 2009
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb   Apr »

Translate Second Chance to Live

Albanian Arabic Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Simplified Chinese Traditional Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Lativian Lithuanian Maltese Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese

Contact card

Copyright © 2026 · All rights reserved. · Sitemap

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Consent

To offer the best experience, we use privacy-respecting technologies like cookies to understand how our site is used. We never use tracking to exploit or overwhelm you. Your consent allows us to improve how we support individuals living with brain injuries, invisible disabilities, and trauma. You are free to accept, decline, or adjust your preferences. 

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}