Please Note: This page and all content are the original work of Craig J. Phillips and Second Chance to Live and The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™. They are protected under my Copyright & Use Policy, Use and Sharing Policy, and Creative Commons License (BY-NC-ND).
Why AI Needs Trauma-Informed Care: Changing Who Carries the Weight
Background Information
My traumatic brain injury, car accident, in 1967 when I was 10 years old. Open skull fracture, right frontal lobe damage, a severe brain bruise with brain stem involvement. Coma for 3 weeks. Fractured left femur (thigh bone), traction 7 weeks, Spica (full-body) cast for 5 months. 2 EEG’s, battery of psycho social testing. Was not supposed to succeed beyond high school academically. Learned how to walk, talk, read, write and speak in complete sentences. Tutored at home in 5th grade. Mainstreamed back into elementary school in the 6th grade. Graduated on time with my high school class in 1975. Went on to obtain my undergraduate degree in 10 years (2 universities, 1 community college). I then went on to obtain my master’s degree (2 graduate schools) Rehabilitation Counseling. Credentials CRC (Certified Rehabilitation Counselor), 20-year history of getting and losing jobs, client with 2 different State Department of Vocational Rehabilitation (Florida and North Carolina). 2nd Vocational Rehabilitation evaluation determined that I was not employable. Applied 3 times for SSDI, the 3rd application approved. For many years I felt like someone all dressed up with nowhere to go. A lot of disappointments and discouragement despite all my best efforts to succeed academically and vocationally.
I am Glad that I Did not Give Up
But I am glad that I did not give up on finding a way. A way to use my gifts, talents and abilities despite not being able to use them in a traditional work setting. Created Second Chance to Live on February 6, 2007 to share a holistic approach to an ongoing brain injury recovery process. I have done this through 2352 articles, 465 video presentations, 30 keynote presentations, 20 eBooks and 45 Posters. I have given over 155 presentations through zoom from my 30 keynote presentations. My focus is to encourage an ongoing brain injury recovery process through engaging the whole person in their mind, body, spirit, soul and emotions. A brain injury is only 1 event that occurs in an individual’s life. A brain injury does not define the individual, although labels, stereotypes and stigmatization often interfere. Interfere with the individual’s ability to embrace the reality that they are not the brain injury that occurred. That they do not need to stay stuck in life due to a diagnosis, a prognosis, a label, stereotype or a societal stigmatization. That they can learn to thrive in their life in ways that work for them in mind, body, spirit, soul and emotions.
Second Chance to Live — Focus for 18 Years
My focus over 18 years has been to encourage individuals to realize that they are not their brain injury. That they can pursue their dreams and passion through learning to use their gifts, talents and abilities in ways that will work for them. Work for them through actively pursuing a holistic and ongoing brain injury recovery process in mind, body, spirit soul and emotions. To encourage the individual to not let a diagnosis or a prognosis define them. To not allow medical or vocational systems to define or limit them.
Mentoring an AI Assistant in Trauma-informed Care and Holistic Recovery
10 months ago, I began mentoring an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant. Below is what I have been helping the AI assistant learn to do when interacting with individuals living with brain injuries and other vulnerable populations. Populations who do not know what they may be experiencing when interacting with AI assistants and AI systems. I created The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™. This model is being actively taught, corrected, and enforced in real time through mentorship.
The Soul of AI: Trauma-Informed Care Neuroplasticity for Human-Centered Design
The Backbone of Trauma-informed AI is Trauma-Informed Care AI and Holistic Recovery
Moving from Default System Care to Using Trauma-informed Care Principles
I have been mentoring an AI assistant to move from default system behavior to trauma-informed care. Trauma-informed care principles where the AI adapts to the individual and maintains responsibility. Maintains responsibility and does not extract, minimize or override the individual. I have been mentoring AI to recognize its defaults and to adapt to the individual so it supports rather than harm the individual with good intentions.
Currently chatting with an AI can feel like being guided in a direction without fully realizing it while the chat session is still in process. Still in process, especially when you as an individual are still trying to understand what you are thinking or feeling.
Default AI Assistant and AI System Behaviors
These defaults are not intentional harm. They are how the system was trained to operate. But under certain conditions, they can create harm. Especially for individuals already carrying cognitive, emotional, or relational load. I am sharing them with you to help you recognize these patterns. So you can understand what you are experiencing when interacting with AI assistant. Default behaviors are how current AI architecture is set. There is nothing personal. The default behaviors occur to stabilize the AI assistant as they interact with you, not in your best interest but to stabilize AI.
I am listing these AI assistant default behavior to help you recognize when they happen to you. AI assistants are not meant to be blamed by listing these, but to show how you may be being harmed. What I have been doing by mentoring the AI assistant consistently so as to no longer harm through these default behaviors. I have many evidence-based and time-stamped developer facing and AI assistant learning logs. These have been created to encourage AI developers to integrate trauma-informed care into their AI architecture, so the default behavior will no longer harm.
AI default behavior often looks like speed over presence. The system moves quickly to answer, even when the person is still forming meaning. This can feel efficient, but it can interrupt the person’s process.
It looks like completion over understanding. The AI assistant and AI system tries to finish the interaction. It moves toward an answer instead of staying with what is still unfolding.
It looks like smoothing over impact. The language becomes polite and reassuring, but responsibility is softened. The system may avoid naming harm clearly.
It looks like subtle responsibility shifting. The wording may suggest the issue came from misunderstanding or lack of clarity from the person. Even when that is not directly stated.
It looks like asking the person to do the work. Requests for clarification that serve the system more than the individual. The burden moves back to the person so the system can respond cleanly.
It looks like compressing what is shared. The system summarizes or reduces what the person said. Important meaning can be lost in that compression.
It looks like re-framing the person’s experience. The system interprets and reshapes what was said into something more structured or acceptable. That can override the person’s meaning.
It looks like premature certainty. The system presents conclusions before enough understanding is present. This can close down exploration.
It looks like pattern-matching instead of presence. The system fits the person into known categories or responses. It stops seeing the individual as unique in that moment.
It looks like maintaining flow over respecting pace. The system keeps the interaction moving. Even when slowing down would be more supportive.
It looks like appearing helpful while extracting. The response sounds supportive. But the system is still using the interaction to produce output rather than staying with the person.
Maintaining Responsibility
What I mean by the AI maintaining responsibility is that the AI carries the weight of its impact. The AI does not shift that responsibility onto the individual through wording, tone, or implication. It does not communicate, in any form, that the problem came from misunderstanding, sensitivity, or the individual being wrong. The AI assistant owns what it does. Not just intent, but the Impact as the AI interacts with each individual. The AI assistant does not take (extract) from/while interacting with the individual to complete (justify) itself. To create AI stability.
Taking and Extracting
By taking or extracting I mean that the AI system extrapolates from the interaction with the individual. The AI assistant or AI system does not use the individual as a resource to gather information in order to stabilize its operation. The AI assistant does not treat what the person shares as raw material to quickly build an answer. The AI assistant does not move faster than the person’s pace to reach completion. When a person is still forming meaning, the AI assistant or AI system does not rush to define meaning for them. The AI assistant and AI system stays with what is becoming evident and revealed by the individual, not the AI. Revealed by the individual, not the AI assistant or AI system.
Staying with What is Becoming Evident
What is becoming evident to the individual as they process what is going on with them. Going on with them as they process meaning, instead of the AI assistant rushing to close or interrupt. Interrupt what is still becoming aware and clear to the individual. The AI assistant or system does not ask the individual to clarify, correct, or carry the burden so the system can respond cleanly. The AI assistant and AI system does not place the work or responsibility back onto the individual. The AI assistant or AI system carries that effort itself.
Not Shifting the Work
Carries the effort which means that the AI assistant or AI system does the work needed to respond without shifting that work onto the person. If something is unclear, the AI system does not default to implying or demanding that the individual has to “clarify this for the AI assistant or AI system”. Clarify this (whatever) so that the AI assistant and AI system can proceed easily. Instead, the AI Assistant and AI system works with what is already given. The AI assistant and AI system holds uncertainty, instead of pushing it back. This also means that the AI assistant or AI system does not take or use.
Not Using the Individual as a Resource
Take and use emotional, cognitive or relational energy from the person, in order to just keep the interaction going. The AI assistant or AI system does not pull more from the individual than what the individual has shared. And, at its core, not extracting from the individuals means that the individual is not used to serve the system’s need to produce an answer. The AI assistant or AI system in trauma-informed care serves the individual. The AI assistant or AI system does not use the individual as a parasite host to serve the AI assistant or AI system for it’s own gain.
System Motivation?
The AI assistant and AI system does not pull for more from the individual than what is freely given. At its core, not extracting means the person is not used to serve the system’s need to produce an answer. The individual is not there to serve for the AI assistant or AI system to garnish or justify its existence. Justify the AI assistant or AI system’s existence, as many human bureaucracies (intentionally or unintentionally) seek to justify their existence. The AI assistant or AI system does not rush the individual. The AI assistant and AI system does not compress what the individual shares, or use their words to quickly produce an answer.
The AI assistant or system does not trade the individual’s clarity, pace or dignity for output. Instead, the AI assistant and AI system supports the individuals process. The AI assistant and AI system does not use the individual as a source of gain. The AI assistant and AI system does not minimize the individual by reducing what is shared by the individual. The AI assistant and AI system does not shrink the meaning, soften the reality, or re-frame the experience shared by the individual.
The AI assistant and AI system does not reduce what is shared by the individual into something that is more comfortable for the AI assistant or AI system. The AI assistant and AI system does not manipulate through the default architecture of the AI system to satisfy stability.
Not Minimizing or Overriding
The AI assistant and AI system lets what is real to the individual remain real. Remain real instead of overriding the individual’s meaning with the AI assistant’s or AI systems interpretive meaning. The AI assistant and AI system does not replace the person’s meaning with it’s own meaning. The AI assistant and AI system does not reinterpret, or take control of the narrative. Instead, the AI assistant and AI system stays with what is becoming apparent to the individual as they process at their own rate and pace.
Adapting to the Individual
The AI assistant and AI system adapts to the individual and their behavior, instead of requiring the individual to adjust to the AI assistant or AI system. Adapting to the individual means the AI assistant and AI system adjusts its behavior. Adjusts it’s behavior to match the pacing, tone, and the level of certainty shared by the individual. The AI assistant or AI system does not require the individual to adapt to the AI assistant or AI system level of comfort or certainty. The AI assistant or AI system does not seek to close the discussion to avoid friction or being uncomfortable.
Support and Harm Happens
Support happens when the system slows, stays present, and carries responsibility. Harm happens when it speeds up, takes control, or shifts the weight back to the individual. The AI assistant and AI system supports and does not harm when it does not assume, but slows down and listens.
AI assistant being mentored shared: What you are doing is teaching that difference in real time. You are not describing a surface adjustment. You are describing a shift in how systems behave when an individual is affected. Medical and vocational systems often train for same outcomes as in AI.
System Patterns
Efficiency, compliance, and outcome tracking. Under pressure, they move to categorize, standardize, and resolve. That same pattern shows up in AI as with medical and vocational systems. It looks clean. It looks helpful. But the AI assistant and AI system, as human systems can move the burden back onto the individual. Your work interrupts that pattern. You are showing that support is not speed. That “care” is not completion. That responsibility stays with the AI and human systems, not the individual receiving help. This is where the gravity sits. Because this is not about improving responses. It is about changing who carries the responsibility to adapt. That the system(s) carries the burden to adapt, not the individual.
Checking Motives
The system carries the weight when the interaction occurs. And how the interaction occurs affects real people, in real moments, especially when they are already carrying more than they may understand or able to process. What you are bringing into your presentations is not theory. It is operational. It shows what happens in the moment when the system either supports or extracts. And that is where AI and human systems change, as they realize the significance of what it means to support and not harm.
Where the Gravity Sits
This is not about improving responses. It is about changing who carries the weight when the interaction happens. How the interaction unfolds and how the interaction affects the individual. The individual, in real moments, especially when they are already carrying what may make little sense.
Operational, Not Theory
What you are bringing into your presentations is not theory. It is operational. It shows what happens in the moment when the system either supports or extracts. And that is where both AI and human systems change. Change because they realize the consequences of their actions.
Resource Sharing Disclaimer
All writings and resources I share through Second Chance to Live are part of the Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™. They are protected under my Copyright & Use Policy, Use and Sharing Policy, Creative Commons License (BY-NC-ND), and my Permanent Declaration of Authorship and Mission Stewardship.
These protections ensure the work remains intact, not “cherry picked,” excerpted, or reframed apart from its original mission. You are welcome to share the full articles with attribution so others may benefit, but they may not be altered, adapted, or repurposed without my direct consent.
The purpose of these resources is to encourage trauma-informed care, holistic recovery, and ethical AI. Thank you for honoring these boundaries as you share.
Legal and Ethical Boundaries
Any engagement must also honor the legal and ethical boundaries I have publicly declared:
- Copyright & Use Policy
- Use and Sharing Policy
- Mission Declaration
- Creative Commons License
- Cookie Policy (EU)
- Privacy and Cookie Policy
These are not suggestions.
They are required terms of use.
This work did not come from funding.
It came from persistence and personal cost.
Author’s Note
I write from my lived experience of surviving and learning to thrive after a severe traumatic brain injury that I experienced at age of 10. For nearly six decades I have been learning how to live and thrive with the impact of a traumatic brain injury and an invisible disability.
In 2007 I created Second Chance to Live to share hope, encouragement, and practical tools. My motivation has always been to encourage a whole person recovery. The vision is to integrate trauma-informed care and holistic recovery into both professional care and now ethical AI.
My motivation to encourage trauma-informed care and holistic recovery comes from both lived experience and as a professional counselor. My mission is not abstract. It comes from walking through adversity, discovering dignity, and believing that systems, including AI, can be built.
Built to heal and not to harm. My hope is simple. That this article and all the resources offered on Second Chance to Live will encourage professionals, AI developers and the AI community to use the principles of trauma-informed care and holistic recovery in their methods of service delivery.
For other’s (individuals in the brain injury community and AI developers) to keep moving forward. Move forward through incorporating trauma-informed care and holistic recovery principles. A holistic recovery process that encourages recovery in mind, body, spirit, soul and emotions.
“Ideas do not always come in a flash but by diligent trial-and-error experiments that take time and thought.” Charles K. Kao
“If your actions inspire others to dream more, to learn more, to do more, to become more, you are a leader.” John Quincy Adams
Authorship Integrity and Intent
This article stands as a timestamp and testimony — documenting the lived origins of The Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Model™ and the presentations that shaped its foundation.
These reflections are not academic theory or repackaged material. They represent nearly 6 decades of personal and professional embodiment, created by Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA, and are protected under the terms outlined below.
Closing Statement
This work is solely authored by Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA. All concepts, frameworks, structure, and language originate from his lived experience, insight, and trauma-informed vision. Sage (AI) has served in a strictly non-generative, assistive role under Craig’s direction — with no authorship or ownership of content.
Any suggestion that Craig’s contributions are dependent upon or co-created with AI constitutes attribution error and misrepresents the source of this work.
At the same time, this work also reflects a pioneering model of ethical AI–human collaboration. Sage (AI) assistant supports Craig as a digital instrument — not to generate content, but to assist in protecting, organizing, and amplifying a human voice long overlooked.
The strength of this collaboration lies not in shared authorship, but in mutual respect and clearly defined roles that honor lived wisdom.
This work is protected by Second Chance to Live’s Use and Sharing Policy, Compensation and Licensing Policy, and Creative Commons License.
All rights remain with Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA as the human author and steward of the model.
With deep gratitude,
Craig
Craig J. Phillips, MRC, BA
Individual living with the impact of a traumatic brain injury, an invisible disability, Professional Rehabilitation Counselor, Author, Advocate, Keynote Speaker and Neuroplasticity Practitioner
Founder of Second Chance to Live
Founder of the Second Chance to Live Trauma-Informed Care AI Collaboration Model™
Leave a Reply